|

Burton, 23 August 2009 © J Southworth
This moth was trapped, identified and submitted in
good faith as a False Mocha Cyclophora porata, although the specimen was not
retained. Since publication on this website a number of people
queried this identification, and in an effort to canvass further
opinion I put this on the Yahoo groups UK Moth site. A number
of eminent observers have now offered their opinions, and this moth
has now had four names attributed to it: False Cyclophora
porata, Blair's Cyclophora puppillaria and
Jersey Mocha Cyclophora ruficiliaria, and 2nd generation Clay Triple-lines
Cyclophora linearia.
It has been pointed out that its arrival coincided precisely with a
south-easterly flow from France, so it is undoubtedly an immigrant.
There is no doubt that this is a tricky individual,
and any further contributions are welcome. Please email me at
tbox[at]jet2.com, and your opinions would be very welcome. I
offer some links to False Mocha pictures, from which you can
navigate to the other suggested species, as well as the standard UK
Moths and other websites, to help stimulate the debate.
http://www.nhm.ac.uk/jdsml/research-curation/research/projects/cockayne/taxon.dsml?taxonID=4750&taxon=Cyclophora
porata
http://www.biolib.cz/en/taxon/id52350/
http://www.vlindernet.nl/fotoalbum.php?vlinderid=92&fotoid=5892&soort=museum
Update 16th February
There
have been a number of emails from very knowledgeable recorders who support the
False Mocha identification, and others who favour Jersey Mocha. With such
a difficult family group, it is possible that there are published mis-identifications
that are muddying the waters, so without a specimen it may not be possible to be
100% certain.
I add a
selection of photographs, some of which are mine, at the risk of having the
identity questioned by some of you. Anything for a good debate.
Blair's Mocha
Cyclophora puppillaria,
Hungary, June 2008 © T A Box
Mocha
Cyclophora
annularia and False Mocha
Cyclophora porata, Hungary, June 2008 © T A Box

Jersey Mocha
Cyclophora ruficiliaria, Hungary, June 2008 © T A Box
Jersey Mocha
Cyclophora ruficiliaria, Chickerell, Dorset, 2 August 2008 © C Pinder
This one has been questioned as possibly something like
Cyclophora quercimontaria

Jersey Mocha
Cyclophora ruficiliaria, Maenporth, Cornwall © G Davis
Jersey Mocha
Cyclophora ruficiliaria, Broadwey, Dorset © P Harris
False Mocha
Cyclophora porata,
Namur, Lavaux-Ste-Anne, Belgium 13 May 2005 © Chris Steeman
False Mocha
Cyclophora porata,
Namur, Lavaux-Ste-Anne, Belgium, 11 August 2006 © Chris Steeman
Update 17th February
I add a contribution from Nick
Smith from Northants who has been prepared to offer his opinion based on
False Mocha specimens trapped in garden.
"I’m located Northants, and
was interested, as the False Mocha is very rarely seen at all in Northants,
but is found regularly in my garden, so I have seen several specimens over
the last 2-3 years I have been recording. My comments are strictly my
opinion, based on what moths I have seen / photographed here, which are
almost certain to be resident species, not migrants
I appreciate that continental
or local specimens to you may not fit my criteria and may blow apart my
comments.
Although your moth exhibits
many characteristics of the False Mocha, I think it is more likely a
Jersey
Mocha (although I have never seen one), based on the following criteria :
-
On False Mocha, I have never
seen this density and spread of dusting of this orange-brown colouring as
your specimen, either in Spring or Summer/Autumn specimens
-
On False Mocha, the Eyes on
the Forewing always have a distinct dark or darkish ring around them
-
On False Mocha, the Hind wing
dots form a very distinct ‘M’ at the meeting of the hind wings and continue
a zig-zag course across the remainder of the hindwings
-
On False Mocha, The Fore wing
dots also have a more erratic zig-zag course, but not so distinct as the
hindwing
All rather subjective, but at
least based on first-hand specimens of UK specimens. I hope this
stimulates more discussion /comment. Here are Spring and Summer specimens
from the garden"
%202.jpg)
False Mocha
Cyclophora porata,
1st generation, Northants © N Smith
False Mocha
Cyclophora porata, 2nd
generation, Northants © N Smith
Update 18th February
I also add
second brood Clay Triple-lines Cyclophora
linearia to show their similarity, especially as this
is another species suggested that is supported by some.

Clay Triple-lines Cyclophora linearia, Harlech area
© H Bantock
Clay Triple-lines Cyclophora linearia, Maulden wood, Beds © A
Banthorpe /
www.vc30moths.org.uk
Philip Jewess comments "The genus Cyclophora is surprisingly
difficult, with species that show a high degree of variability and some that
have two broods that could be mistaken for different species. I have
regularly trapped and reared C.porata from Surrey. My C. porata
always have a rather fuzzy blotch between the subterminal line and the termen,
although it varies in its intensity. The 'mystery moth' has such a blotch,
although it is indistinct. Neither C. puppillaria nor C.
linearia (2nd brood) have this, so that would tend to rule both these out.
C. puppilliaria also has a very sharp apex to the forewing. That
would leave either C. porata or C.ruficiliaria, with which I am
not familiar, although I would agree with Nick Smith who notes that the forewing
discal spot of C. porata has a dark margin and this is not present in the
mystery moth.
It all goes to show the advisability of retaining and setting insects that are
unfamiliar for future critical examination. One cannot always identify
unequivocally from a photograph".
Keith Tailby adds
"Having seen literally dozens of Jersey Mocha, of both broods, on Jersey over
the last few years and being familiar with all the other UK species that have
been suggested for this specimen............ I can only confirm that a primary
distinguishing feature of the species is that there are NO dark rings bordering
the pale/white orbicular stigmata.
Here is a image of a 2nd-brood specimen of Jersey Mocha, confirmed by gen.det.

Jersey Mocha
Cyclophora ruficiliaria,
(gen. det.), 2nd brood © K Tailby
Update 19th February
From the Yahoo
groups UK Moth site Chris Manley mentions that the Jersey Mocha in the
first (2008) edition of his British Moths and Butterflies, is actually a
second-brood Clay Triple-lines.
Update 21st February
Further comments
received from various interested parties, mainly focussing on the lack of or
presence of dark rings around the pale orbicular stigmata. If Keith
Tailby's assertation that Jersey's do not have dark rings is correct as
supported by most photos, it seems to rule out both the moth in question, and
raises a question about the Chickerell record. Although the Chickerell
record was gen.det., it was originally thought to be False Mocha, but did
the gen. det. prove it was not False Mocha rather than definitely
Jersey? Other than the Chickerell moth, are there any photographs
at all of confirmed Jersey Mocha with dark rings? Philip mentions
the 'fuzzy blotch between the subterminal line and the termen' for both False
and Jersey, and this is supported by most published photos, and is
present on both the mystery moth and the Chickerell one.
Out of interest, of all of the suggestions received, with some
changing of minds along the way, the support for Jersey Mocha, False Mocha
and Clay Triple-lines is roughly 40 / 40 / 20 as a percentage.

Jersey Mocha
Cyclophora ruficiliaria, Chickerell, Dorset, 2 August 2008 © C Pinder
Update 27th February
The following are offered by Angus following a request for
pictures of Clay Triple-lines. He says he has caught up to
50 in a trap which was astonishing for a scarce
species in Ireland and adds they were very variable.
All three are 2nd
brood Clay Triple-lines, County Meath, Ireland, August 2006 © A Tyner
Postscript 31st March
Peter Davey has received some news from Martin Townsend on Jersey Mocha. He has
recently identified what he previously thought was a
Blair’s Mocha trapped on 18 August 1996 at Worth
Matravers, as Jersey Mocha. This pre-dates the first UK
mainland specimen, trapped on Portland by John Chainey in
2003, by seven years.
This just goes to confirm that the family group are difficult
and there has been confusion in the past. I am open to any further input,
but without a specimen, this one may never be resolved.
Update 6th September
I have received photos of what appears to be of two different
types submitted as a and b, and would appreciate any comments as to their
identity. They were caught on night of 3 September, at Vernditch Chase,
which is just in Wiltshire by about 1/2 mile. Initial thoughts from a
couple of observers have suggested 2nd brood Clay Triple-lines for all of
them, and any further input would be welcomed.

Submitted as type a

Submitted as type b
Update 9th September
All of a small number of correspondents have put these all down
as 2nd generation Clay Triple-lines, and I cannot help feeling that some of
those claimed as Jersey Mocha are also this species..
Two good links for looking at these species have been supplied by
Peter Davey.
Jersey Mocha:
http://www.lepiform.de/cgi-bin/lepiwiki.pl?Cyclophora_Ruficiaria
Clay Triple-lines:
http://www.lepiform.de/cgi-bin/lepiwiki.pl?Cyclophora_Linearia |